Legal Experts Slam Jack Smith's "Lousy" Case Against Trump

A group of legal experts have criticized special counsel Jack Smith's case against former President Donald Trump, arguing that it is "lousy" and unlikely to succeed.

🔊 Click play button to listen

Trump is the first former president to be indicted on criminal charges. ( SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

The experts, who include former federal prosecutors, law professors, and legal analysts, say that Smith's case is based on untested legal theories and that it relies on a narrow interpretation of the law. They also argue that the case is politically motivated and that it is an attempt to silence Trump's political opponents.

One of the main criticisms of Smith's case is that it relies on a theory of "willful blindness". This theory argues that Trump could be held liable for his actions even if he did not explicitly intend to interfere in the election, as long as he was aware that his actions could have that effect. However, the experts argue that this theory is untested and that it is unlikely to be successful in court.

Another criticism of Smith's case is that it is based on a narrow interpretation of the law. The experts argue that the law does not specifically prohibit Trump's actions, and that it is therefore unlikely that a jury would convict him.

"This is a lousy case," said Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University. "It's based on untested legal theories and it relies on a narrow interpretation of the law. It's unlikely to succeed."

Turley is not the only legal expert who has criticized Smith's case. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy said that the case is "politically motivated" and that it is an attempt to silence Trump's political opponents.

"This is a witch hunt," McCarthy said. "It's an attempt to silence Trump and his supporters."

Smith has defended his case, arguing that it is "sound" and that it has "merit". However, the experts' criticisms suggest that it faces an uphill battle.

It remains to be seen whether Smith's case will be successful. However, the legal experts' criticisms suggest that it is unlikely to succeed.

In conclusion, a group of legal experts have criticized special counsel Jack Smith's case against Donald Trump, arguing that it is "lousy" and unlikely to succeed. The experts say that the case is based on untested legal theories and that it relies on a narrow interpretation of the law. They also argue that the case is politically motivated and that it is an attempt to silence Trump's political opponents. Smith has defended his case, but the experts' criticisms suggest that it faces an uphill battle.