Judge Arthur Engoron Loses His Cool During Trump's Civil Fraud Trial

Judge Arthur Engoron, the judge presiding over Donald Trump's civil fraud trial in New York, lost his cool during the testimony of Trump's ex-accountant, Donald Bender. Bender was being grilled by Trump's lawyers, and Engoron became increasingly frustrated with his evasive answers.

🔊 Listen to this article now

At one point, Engoron slammed his hand on the bench and shouted, "This is ridiculous!" He then warned Trump's lawyers to stop wasting time.

Engoron's outburst is understandable. He is a judge who is trying to preside over a fair trial, and he was clearly frustrated with Bender's unwillingness to answer the lawyers' questions directly.

However, some people have criticized Engoron for losing his cool. They argue that a judge should remain calm and impartial at all times.

Others have defended Engoron, arguing that he was simply trying to do his job. They say that Bender's evasive answers were disrupting the trial, and that Engoron was right to become frustrated.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide whether or not they agree with Engoron's outburst. However, it is important to note that he is a human being, and he is allowed to feel emotions like frustration.

It is also important to note that Engoron's outburst did not seem to have any impact on the trial. Bender continued to testify, and the trial is still ongoing.

Implications of Engoron's outburst

Engoron's outburst is significant for a number of reasons. First, it is a sign of the high tensions that have surrounded Trump's civil fraud trial. The trial is being closely watched by the public and the media, and the stakes are very high for Trump.

Second, Engoron's outburst highlights the challenges that judges face when presiding over high-profile trials. Judges are expected to remain calm and impartial at all times, but this can be difficult to do when faced with difficult witnesses or disruptive behavior.

Third, Engoron's outburst raises the question of whether or not judges should be allowed to express their emotions in the courtroom. Some people believe that judges should always remain calm and impartial, while others believe that judges should be allowed to express their emotions when necessary.